In Part 1 of this series of posts, I outlined parts of the overall appeals process in federal criminal trials – which is what will govern how the appeal that was filed in Keith Raniere’s case will be handled.
In Part 1 of this series of posts, I outlined part of the overall appeals process in federal criminal trials – which is what will govern how the appeal that was filed in Keith Raniere’s case is being handled.
[Editor’s Note: This post was updated on Monday, May 24th, after I noticed a couple of things that were not as clearly stated as I thought they should be].
[Editor’s Note: Below is a compilation of comments that K.R. Claviger has made regarding the current debate concerning the nude photos of Cami that were supposedly taken when she was 15-years-old. Because these comments were made at different times, there may be some overlap and duplication.]
K. R. Claviger is our legal correspondent and has always been generous about replying to comments and answering questions of readers. Here are some of his replies to commenters explaining the upcoming restitution hearings for Keith Raniere.
Suneel Chakravorty recently posted a list of forty-four (44) legal questions regarding Keith Raniere’s case that he and his colleagues are currently examining in their quest to obtain a new trial for Keith (See: Suneel: My Plan to Show the World What Really Happrened to Keith Raniere ).
This is the last post in the series concerning the various legal claims that Keith Raniere put forth in his “Call To Action” .
This is the latest post in the series concerning the various legal claims that Keith Raniere put forth in his “Call To Action”. Prior posts in this series may be found at;
[Editor’s Note: I miscalculated the amount of time that Keith Raniere was incarcerated before he went to trial: that was 15 months. It was another 16 months after his trial before he was sentenced. Appropriate corrections have been made to this post].
